User talk:89.172.66.209

May 2021

Hello, I'm Vacant0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Serb countries and regions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Vacant0 (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

@Vacant0: I agree. User IP, being that you initiated the removal of content, whether you are right or wrong with the change (I haven’t had the time to look at the content changes in question) please make an account, start a dialogue on the talk page, do not edit war or change IPs. I know IPs can change sometimes so assuming you are not aware. PLEASE MAKE AN ACCOUNT. IP addresses from all parts of the world have been destructive in the past which already will lead to negative first impressions right or wrong. But your diffs aren’t help, please understand. Also it is against wiki policy to canvas (pick specific users you suspect would side with you) yet not contacting a single perceived editor more focused on Serbian related topics. As you reached out to me and other specific editors. Contact Serbian, Bosnian and other balkan wili project pages on here to get many groups engaged. Keep in mind, now more than ever, outside admins are more struct with such behavior since a recent ANI topic bans two months ago. If you feel that there is no progress, you can resort to perhaps and RfC to bring in outside parties that aren’t Balkan-Centric like all of us. It helps keep the waters somewhat calm. Also keep in mind, The Kingdoms of Serbia or Croatia or Bosnia amd so on exchanged lands many times in history. No one is saying today that “Bosnian is a Serbian territory”. I am not that familiar with geo-history of Bosnia on more than a valance level. So this is out of my knowledge space pretty much. Stay well all. OyMosby (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply @OyMosby:. I've requested page protected and it got its approval so I assume that there won't be any future edit wars there. It seems like the text was added by a sockpuppet account in late March 1, 2 and I fairly didn't know this until checking it today. I won't be supporting the readdition of the text in any possible way since it was added by a sockpuppet. Let me know if you're alright with this, stay well. Vacant0 (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Also something that I want to say is that, in my opinion, more articles have to get protected so that these additions won't happen in the future. That page shows it all, it was unprotected. Vacant0 (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@Vacant0: I feel like there is a sudden uptick of IP trolls on here. Hurling toxic insults and come back with different IP adresses. I agree that a lot of articles need ro be protected as like you and Elserbio0 (I think as they removed puppet state and fascist from the Mostar article) and I even have a hard time pinning down who added what. I thought this IP was the original editor. It’s nuts. OyMosby (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Yeah I've noticed that too, it's hard to pay attention to those details. I already have some sort of a list of articles that in my opinion have to be protected due to present vandalism on those pages, if you have it too we can contact an administrator to talk about it. It would make things a lot easier, but again, for future additions, I'd prefer if we all discuss it first before implementing it. Vacant0 (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Agreed. I’ll look into some more and let you know on your page. Thanks for reaching out to an admin for this article. OyMosby (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

---